How to Tackle Code Debt While Keeping Features on Track > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Addressing a refactoring cycle without delaying delivery requires structured coordination and shared accountability. The core principle is to integrate technical debt reduction into your existing workflow rather than segmenting it from feature work.

Initiate with identifying the most debilitating areas of legacy code that are increasing maintenance overhead. These should be prioritized based on their impact on product pace, system health, and team engagement.

Work with your product owner to connect them to customer and revenue impact—for example, proving that stabilizing third-party connections lowers churn or how cleaning up legacy logic unlocks rapid innovation.

Following consensus allocate a small but consistent portion of each sprint—around one-fifth—to technical debt tasks. This keeps debt from compounding while still ensuring feature velocity remains intact.

Break down large debt items into manageable, verifiable, sprint-sized units so they can be delivered before the next planning session.

Ensure every item includes clear acceptance criteria and is subjected to the same QA process.

Engage all disciplines in the process—devs, testers, and business representatives—to build shared understanding and нужна команда разработчиков accountability.

Leverage test suites to prevent unintended side effects as you modernize.

Should complications occur during the sprint, be prepared to halt and reevaluate, but maintain focus by sticking to the agreed-upon boundaries.

In the end, report and celebrate gains: monitor faster test runs, fewer production incidents, or higher deployment cadence to showcase tangible progress.

Gradually this repetitive, non-disruptive rhythm turns code quality governance into a sustainable habit rather than a last-minute scramble.